|
|
 |
|
|
1 9 9
9 | |
-
Merger mania? |
|
|
Be An
Intelligent Partner! |
|
|
|
By Stephen M. Dent |
|
| Mergers, acquisitions, and strategic
alliances are touted as a boom for both consumers and shareholders which
is why corporate America continues on its consolidation frenzy year
after year. But when you strip away the veneer, mergers and strategic
partnerships don't always deliver their intended results. In fact, as
many as 70 percent of them fail to live up to their potential.
Why?
The answer is rooted in "Partnering
Intelligence" -- a business discipline that is sorely lacking in many
corporate
 |
Stephen
Dent | boardrooms and executive suites. While tough talk and moxie
close deals, partnering intelligence brings those deals to fruition. It
is a core competency that translates boardroom bravado into shareholder
value.
As with any hard competency, this is not a nebulous
concept but a measurable skill. Every executive, manager and employee
has a quantifiable PQ, or partnering quotient; much like an IQ, this
measures how smart someone is about partnerships. It is a clear
indication of how well someone can work with others to translate lofty
ambitions into actions that generate value from a business
alliance.
The other major reason partnerships fail is that they
don't follow a sound process for guiding people and teams through the
critical stages of partnership development. Operating from a PQ deficit,
many executives expect they can achieve maximum "synergy" by simply
consolidating operations.
An intelligent partner would understand
that, to get the most from any business alliance, you have to take
certain steps. Such steps are analogous to the steps an industrial
engineer might take in merging the best features of two separate
production processes.
There's not an engineer who would just
throw two production lines together and expect to achieve optimality
without carefully reviewing the processes or following a discreet
methodology for ensuring the "merger" effort is successful. Yet many
highly paid executives do this every day with entire companies. They are
people with low PQ's who, unfortunately, shortchange themselves, their
customers, employees and their shareholders.
Executives with a
high PQ, on the other hand, do what you would expect from people who
understand what it takes to implement the organizational and cultural
changes set in motion by business alliances. After their deals are done,
partnership-literate executives shift their mental orientation from
hard-nosed negotiation to the attributes they and their subordinates
need to make partnerships work. In brief form, these attributes
are:
Past/Future orientation: Do you look to the past or
to the future in evaluating your business
relationships?
Comfort with change: Are you comfortable
with changing your status quo?
Win/Win orientation: Do you
employ a problem-solving method that creates a win/win outcome for both
parties?
Comfort with interdependence: Can you work in
concert to achieve mutually-agreed-upon partnership
goals?
Ability to trust: Do you give people your trust, or
do they have to earn it?
Self-disclosure and feedback: Are
you comfortable with disclosing your needs and expressing your
appreciation or disappointment?
These critical attributes form a
system of behavior that creates healthy, thriving partnerships. Just as
the earth's atmosphere protects and nurtures life on the planet, a
healthy partnership environment nurtures and protects important business
and organizational relationships.
In reality, businesses don't
partner -- people do. Companies that build effective partnering
competencies in their workforce will fare much better than their
shoot-from-the-hip counterparts in achieving the aims of their mergers,
acquisitions and other business alliances.
These companies
develop an understanding that people hold the keys to effective
partnerships, and that partnering intelligence can be measured and
learned. They utilize available tools to develop partnering intelligence
throughout their organizations. And they roll out their business
alliances according to a defined process for making partnerships
work.
In doing so, they avoid one of the most common outgrowths
of a poor PQ. While top company officers diligently study the numbers
and potential benefits associated with a business alliance, they neglect
the core competencies of effective partnering. They seek neither the
construct nor the tools to recognize or build an effective partnership
capability in their workforce.
The result is a clear and
predictable minimization of the benefits derived from any new business
relationship they undertake. The most talented, valuable people leave.
Synergies are not achieved as expected. And the board, after having
invested millions, or even billions, starts looking for some heads to
claim. |<
|